Which description best fits a license in property rights?

A license in property rights is best described as being granted for a brief, limited way without exclusive rights. This concept is essential in understanding the nature of a license, which allows a person to use another's property for a specific purpose, usually under certain conditions defined by the property owner. Unlike an easement, which provides a more permanent and often exclusive right to use someone else's land, a license is typically temporary and revocable at any time by the property owner.

Licenses do not give the licensee exclusive possession or control over the property; instead, they merely provide permission to engage in specific activities. This means that other individuals can also use the property in ways that do not interfere with the licensed use. This temporary and non-exclusive aspect is crucial to understanding how licenses function legally and practically in property rights.

The other options outline characteristics that do not align with the definition of a license. A permanent right or one that is transferable or enforceable against future owners is more reflective of easements or ownership rights, not licenses. Similarly, while a prescriptive easement develops over time through continuous use, which can lead to rights against a property owner, a license does not create this type of interest in property.